ABSTRACT
Treatment mechanics should be individualized to be suitable for each patient`s personal teeth and anatomic environment to get a best treatment result with the least harmful effects to teeth and surrounding tissues. Especially, the change of biomechanical reaction associated with that of the centers of resistance of teeth should be considered when crown-to-root ratio changed due to problematic root resorption and/or periodontal disease during adult orthodontic treatment. At the present study in order to investigate patterns of initial displacements of anterior teeth under certain orthodontic force when crown-to-root ratio changed in not only normal periodontal condition but also abnormal periodontal and/or teeth condition, the changes of the centers of resistance for maxillary and mandibular 6 anterior teeth as a segment were studied using the laser reflection technique, the lever&pulley force applicator and the photodetector with these quantified variables reducing alveolar bone 2mm by 2mm for each of maxillary 6 anterior teeth until the total amount of 8mm and root 2mm for each of mandibular 6 anterior ones until the total amount of 6mm. The results were as follows: 1. Under unreduced condition, the center of resistance during initial displacement of maxillary 6 anterior teeth was located at the point of about 42.4% apically from cemento-enamel junction(CEJ) of the averaged tooth of them and kept shifting to about 76.7% with alveolar bone reduction. 2. The distance from the averaged alveolar crest level of maxillary 6 anterior teeth to the center of resistance for the averaged tooth of them kept decreasing with alveolar bone reduction, but the ratio to length of the averaged root embedded in the alveolar bone was stable at around 33% regardless of that. 3. Under unreduced condition, the center of resistance during initial displacement of mandibular 6 anterior teeth was located at the point of about 43% apically from CEJ of the averaged tooth of them and this ratio kept increasing tc about 54% with root reduction. Bur the distance from CEJ to the center of resistance decreased from around 5.3mm to around 3.3mm, that is to say, the center of resistance kept shifting toward CEJ with the shortening of root length. 4. A unit reduction of alveolar bone had greater effects on the change of the centers of resistance than that of root did during initial phase of each reduction. But both of them had similar effects at the middle region of whole length of the averaged root.
Subject(s)
Adult , Humans , Mechanics , Periodontal Diseases , Root Resorption , Tooth Cervix , ToothABSTRACT
At present, many orthodontists regard the root parallelism of the posterior teeth important not only in diagnosis and treatment planning but also for predicting posttreatment stability. To evaluate it, they usually refer to the orthopantomogram. At this study, 97 samples were collected from students of Yonsei University, who have well-proportioned face, Angles's class I canine & molar relationships and no crown axis deviation of the posterior teeth including canines. Reliability of the root parallelism observed from orthopantomogram was evaluated by comparison with 45degrees oblique cephalogram. The results were as follows : 1. In comparing the differences between anglular measurements in 45degrees oblique cephalogram & orthopantomogram with 5degrees, those to mandibular plane were significantly less than to occlusal plane in number of items which showed less differences than 5degrees. 2. Compared the root parallelisms in the orthopantomogram with those in 45degrees oblique cephalogram with 1% significance level, parallelism between upper canine & 1st premolar, lower canine & Ist premolar, lower 1st premolar & 2nd premolar, and lower right 2nd molar & 3rd molar showed statistically significant differences. 3. When the significance between the differences of the root parallelism between above two kinds of film and 5degrees was verified by two sided paired t-test, more or less large difference was shown between lower right 2nd molar & 3rd molar, a little larger than 5degrees between lower canine & 1st premolar, smaller at the rest of them. 4. In 45degrees oblique cephalogram, lower canine & 1st premolar showed convergent root arrangements each other, while in orthopantomogram they were divergent each other. All the others except them showed convergency on the upper, divergency on the lower in both films.